Search for: "State v. Johnson" Results 7161 - 7180 of 8,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2009, 1:12 pm by Jeff Gamso
As of 3:58 Eastern Time, the docket doesn't reflect the freeing, though it does recount the January 5 date.John Kindley at People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Kit Johnson, Pereira v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am by Amy Howe
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
It is not uncommon for the state apparatus itself to be impeached by the people as a core political act; but the state protects its own apparatus through an ideology of law that vests the legitimate power to impeach (like political power) only in itself. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:03 pm by MacIsaac
It is not correct to say, however, that the plaintiff herself could not claim for assistance provided by family members in a family enterprise (see Johnson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm by Jon
(Actually, he overlooked military crimes, but those only applied to military and militia when in federal service, and were a kind of private law.)However, in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Johnson , No. 07-10 In a proceeding seeking post-conviction relief for conviction of capital murder and robbery, denial of petitioner's writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a failure to seek public funds for a DNA expert, as well as a failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence. [read post]