Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 7161 - 7180 of 13,897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2014, 3:47 am by Ben
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is Oracle America Inc vs. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No.13-35653. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:21 am by Gene Quinn
Du­ tailier Int’l, Inc., 393 F. 3d 1378 (2005), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that “[a] case may be deemed exceptional” under § 285 only in two situations: (1) “when there has been some material inappropriate conduct,” or (2) when the litigation is both “brought in subjective bad faith” and “objectively baseless. [read post]
6 May 2014, 9:50 am by Jonathan Bailey
., Canada’s largest toy company, is suing competitors Brix n Clix, Rehco LLC and CYI Inc. in a California court for copyright infringement. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:35 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Courts Virginia Supreme Court; United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia; United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Virginia; United States District Court, District of Maryland; United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Maryland; United States District Court, District of Columbia; United States Bankruptcy Court District of Columbia Speaking… [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:37 am by Dennis Crouch
., Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2188 (2011) (citing United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:52 am by Dennis Crouch
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:06 am by Garret Murai
Candelaria subcontracted a portion of the work to Otay Group, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm by Cicely Wilson
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., United States Supreme Court (4/29/14)PatentsThe Patent Act authorizes district courts to award attorney’s fees to prevailing parties in “exceptional cases,” 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]