Search for: "Bank Line Limited v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
That would be fitting, because if this fine book is ultimately about one thing, it surely would be debate itself—the deep and fundamental debate that roiled the early United States and transformed it into a new kind of constitutional republic. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
The Supreme Court effectively replaced the conduct and effects test with a transactional test and imposed a bright line rule on the cross-border availability of Rule 10b-5.In Morrison v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
We are also pleased to announce that Seyfarth will continue its trade secrets webinar programming in 2013 and has several exciting topics lined up. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
We are also pleased to announce that Seyfarth will continue its trade secrets webinar programming in 2013 and has several exciting topics lined up. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Dec. 22, 2008)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Black line-worker's race/discharge + retaliation suit9thCircuit Linder v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
In the long litany of head-scratching moments emerging from our growing knowledge about the highest-ranking Republican in the United States government, I was both confused and amused when I saw this in The Guardian. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am
Regulatory oversight is supposed to protect against insurance companies being aggressively stripped of cash and reserves, such as through limits on dividends. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
He also "has expressed a very strong tendency to protect the prerogatives of the judiciary," as in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 3:06 pm
” In Community Financial Services v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
First, Kerr says that Smith is inconsistent with United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 7:42 am
[23] V. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
UK branches of firms whose home state is within the EEA are not required to apply the Code as their home state will be required to apply equivalent provisions under CRD3. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
" In McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Title IX states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be . [read post]
