Search for: "CRIM" Results 701 - 720 of 4,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2009, 8:36 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Evans, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2243 (04 November 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MM (Iran) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 1167 (10 November 2009) Choudhary & Ors v Bhatter & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 510 (11 November 2009) Whittle Movers Ltd v Hollywood Express Ltd [2009] [...] [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:25 pm
From crim law library blog, discussing SCITECH e-Merging News:Claiming Pitfalls in Bioinformatics Patent ApplicationsAnalysis by category patent data from the USPTO shows that the number of patents issued for bioinformatics-related subclasses is relatively low. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:06 am
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Seager; Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Blatch [2009] EWCA Crim 1303; [2009] WLR (D) 220 “Where a confiscation order was made pursuant to s 71 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 or s 6(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 against a defendant in [...] [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:23 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) LA v SB & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1744 (12 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ali v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1619 (12 July 2010) High Court (Patents Court) Fosroc International Ltd v WR Grace & Co-Conn [2010] EWHC 1702 (Pat) (12 July 2010) Source: www.bailii.org.uk [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:49 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Murray, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1792 (16 July 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Joyce v Secretary of State for Health [2008] EWHC 1891 (Admin) (01 August 2008) High Court (Patents Court) Magical Marking Ltd & Anor v Phillips & Ors [2008] EWHC 1640 (Pat) (07 July 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:46 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) GJB v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 867 (01 April 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Secerno Ltd & Ors v Oxford Magistrates Court & Anor [2011] EWHC 1009 (Admin) (19 April 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) Dubai Islamic Bank PJSC v PSI Energy Holding Company & Ors (Rev 1) [2011] EWHC 1019 (Comm) (19 April 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 2:09 pm
In his post here, the Super Muppet of Appellate Advocacy discussed learning of the Army's counterpart to the Navy JAG Corps' military justice career track while at this year's Crim Law New Developments Course. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:51 am
Regina v Patel; Regina v Hussain [2009] EWCA Crim 2311; [2009] WLR (D) 327 "The Medicines for Human Use (Marketing Authorisations Etc) Regulations 1994 were not to be construed as prohibiting transactions which were not intended to have the effect, nor had the effect, of releasing a medical product into a distribution scheme which would lead [...] [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 9:40 pm by Tyson Snow
Harris, Case No. 2011NY080152, 2012 WL 1381238 (N.Y Crim Ct. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 12:13 pm by Cynthia Godsoe
It has been an exciting month for a family/crim law person like me, but I am already looking forward to reading the posts of this month's lineup. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 4:41 pm
Houston Law Prof Sandra Guerra Thompson (my own crim law prof) has posted a new paper, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt? [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:57 am by tracey
Regina v S(C): [2012] EWCA Crim 389;  [2012] WLR (D)  54 “Where the purpose of a legislative scheme was to ensure that a child could be subject to the protection of the court, there would be no defence of necessity available in respect of the offence of removing a child from the jurisdiction of England and Wales.” WLR Daily, 29th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:32 pm
Professor Sandra Guerra Thompson, from whom I took Crim Law, conducts a rhetorical voir dire for future rape trials in an opinion piece yesterday in the Houston Chronicle - Fallout from Duke case clouds future rape trials. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:28 am
Keets [2007] EWCA Crim 1924 “The hearsay evidence of a witness who was not available at trial was admissible even if it was the sole or the decisive evidence against a defendant if that was compatible with a fair trial. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:32 am
R v Freeman; R v Crawford [2008] EWCA Crim 1863; [2008] WLR (D) 287 “Some care was required in directing a jury when approaching the cross-admissibility of bad character evidence. [read post]