Search for: "Christian v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm
Prior to the 2000 Supreme Court decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
In one precedent, the Supreme Court ruled in Marsh v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In Runyon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:20 am
In Roark v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:43 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
However, a number of jurisdictions in the United States do forbid that kind of discrimination. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Alhough the Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
” It has been used consistently and exclusively for the secular purpose of honoring those who died fighting for the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
United States; United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 1:14 am
In Navajo Nation v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 8:20 pm
(Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:05 pm
" Harry V. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:46 am
In th[e] [neglected] second half, the Court tells a detailed narrative about the country's historically Christian roots and explains that, other interpretive rules aside, the statute simply cannot be construed against the church-because the United States "is a Christian nation. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled this Wednesday that section 3 of DOMA violates the Constitution. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
” Finally, Joan Biskupic of the USA Today previews next week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:58 pm
Everson v. [read post]
Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
