Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 701 - 720
of 12,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
Does 1-41, W.D. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 2:40 am
This is essentially because the intervention needed to fall within the scope of Article 3(1) does not require to be strictly indispensable: mere facilitation seems enough. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:47 pm
Brennan, 1 N.J. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm
Comment 1. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:38 am
The Ninth Circuit addressed and dismissed three potential avenues for defendants to assert federal jurisdiction: (1) Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
. 'With regard to the conditions that the disclaimer meets the requirements of clarity and conciseness and does not remove more than necessary to restore novelty, both explicitly indicated in G 1/03 (see headnote, points 2.2 and 2.4), the Board concurs with the positions expressed in T 2130/11, points 2.9 and 2.10*. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
This comes from the notice i received:This bill does the following: 1. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, August 27, 2022 Editor's Note: Caroline A. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, August 27, 2022 Editor's Note: Caroline A. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeal said no, on a 2-1 vote (see this blog post). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:47 am
Of special interest to many U.S. employers is that the automatic extension provision applies to employees who have filed adjustment of status applications based on an offer of employment by a U.S. employer, but does not apply to foreign nationals who are employed pursuant to F-1 EADs or to spouses of foreign nationals in H-1B, L-1, E-1/E-2 or E-3 nonimmigrant status. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am
Such threshold does not exist in "saisie-contrefaçon" proceedings in France. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am
Such threshold does not exist in "saisie-contrefaçon" proceedings in France. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
This meant that, strictly speaking, A 102(1) EPC 1973 did not provide the legal basis for revoking the patent if the patent as amended did not meet, for example, the requirements of A 84 or A 123(3) or R 27 or R 29 EPC 1973. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Part I: The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act: Provisions Relevant to Healthcare Providers (March 31, 2020): On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act[1] passed the House of Representatives by a voice vote. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
Id. at 126-27. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:24 pm
The non-user does not by itself render the entry incorrect. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 11:16 am
So, how does this “Romaine” acceptable? [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
Georges] Avenue (Route 27), Linden, Union County, NJ. [read post]
