Search for: "HARPER v. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 10:01 am
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
The fourth quarter of 2011 also saw some very large leveraged buyout transactions in the United States which bodes well for the higher end of the market in Canada, which transactions we have not seen domestically for several years. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
” Copyright Promotes Knowledge The copyright statutes passed in the States prior to the drafting of the Constitution use similar language. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm
As Loreburn E. stated at pp. 320-21 in Adam v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Shawn Turner at Hotel News Now previews RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:43 am
But, United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:52 pm
In my 2003 book, The Supreme Court and Election Law, I discuss the fate of the famous case of Harper v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Shipley, Conflicts Between Copyright and the First Amendment After Harper & Row, Publishers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm
(See Harper’s excellent article on the history of the tax advantaged Google operation Keyword: Evil.) [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Matter of Harper v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 12 Misc 3d 1197(A) An employee received a “counseling memorandum” following an investigation of a complaint alleging sexual harassment filed against him by one of his subordinates.. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Harper Ins. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:35 am
At Law.com, Joshua Engel discusses the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court’s interpretation under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and whether the state court’s interpretation of Florida v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:33 am
Harper Ins. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
