Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10."
Results 701 - 720
of 4,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The court's earlier decision was also based on the court's conclusion - relying on a recent Ninth Circuit case (In re Anonymous Online Speakers) - that the statement in question was commercial speech. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm
If you’re not sure, check with a family law attorney to determine if you have a “spousal equivalent,” domestic partnership, or a legally qualified marriage in your state. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:51 am
While this approach aims to improve judicial transparency, it raises questions about AI’s role in assessing nuanced legal judgments. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 3:22 am
They state as a known issue that syncing more than 25,000 files can be problematic, and they're working on it. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 8:00 am
Even that obtuse contrivance, however, is built on the notion of majority rule, with the key anti-democracy aspect being embodied in the loaded question: "Majority of what? [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:02 am
However, the secretary of state has modified the current annual Corporate Disclosure Statement for publicly traded companies to include questions regarding the number of female directors currently serving on a company’s board (see question 5 in the statement). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:34 am
As a consequence, exceptions and limitations to exclusive rights must be interpreted strictly, and Member States must comply with the three-step test as per Article 5(5) of this directive. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Works that have already been considered for this prize may not be re-submitted. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 12:28 pm
The catch was that the Soviets wanted the U.S. to confine testing of ballistic missile defenses (the Strategic Defense Initiative) to the laboratory for 10 years. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:43 pm
The worst possible outcome would be to dump a bunch of the worst-behaved kids in the state on county probation departments who're ill-equipped to handle them and then fail to provide adequate resources. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
But since no one knows what initial interest confusion is, and defendants can always introduce their single-digit CTR, I think we're done with the argument that keyword ads create initial interest confusion, at least in the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Our initial thought, since our post was six months after Thompson was decided, was "how could the world miss this? [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 7:26 am
Texas police almost never punished when they break rules and kill peopleBest Practices: Police training should prioritized deescalation, get rid of the 21-foot ruleAnd from Grits' contributing writers:Eva Moravec's Point of Impact series producing narrative journalism on Texas police shootings of unarmed people.Amanda Woog's Texas Justice Initiative project documenting deaths at prisons, jails, and in police custody.Podcast conversation between Eva and Amanda, Oct.… [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:30 am
And a final bit of pleasure for my blogging day: I was pleased to see that one of the StandIn founders came out of the Michigan State Reinvent Law initiative. [read post]
15 May 2010, 7:37 am
They're violating federal law. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm
’ If you're not lost by now, you jolly well ought to be. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:24 pm
The clear language of section 361.5, subdivision (b)(10) does not apply to these facts. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
Campbell (No. 10-3002)). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
The Funds do not question the Court’s authority to approve the payment of prepetition claims of critical vendors before plan confirmation, nor do they suggest that the Debtors have no critical vendors. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
Initially the land was transferred to the Lion's Club, and-- after questions were raised about the propriety of that transfer-- the land was re-transferred to private individuals. [read post]
