Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 119,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:11 am by Daily Record Staff
 On May 6, 7, and 8, 2015, a jury trial was held in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:35 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Mann The post Ex-Employee’s Continued Use of Twitter Account May Be Conversion–Farm Journal v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 9:15 am by Daily Record Staff
Maureen May contracted Coccidioidomycosis (commonly known as “Cocci” or “Valley Fever”)—a disease caused by the inhalation of Coccidioides spores, a fungus germane to the semi-arid areas of the southwestern states. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
Otherwise, the grant merely expresses the grantor's confidence that the grantee will use the property so far as may be reasonable and practicable to effect the purpose of the grant.The Will did not include language indicating that, if the State did not comply with the farming provision, the grant to the State would become void and revert to Hinebaugh. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
      The district court held that the United States' condemnation extinguished California's public trust on the entire parcel, and that the 27.54 acres which are filled can be conveyed to a private party free of any trust, but that the 4.88 acres that remained tidelands at the time of the taking are now subject to a Federal public trust and may not be conveyed to a private party. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:09 am by Tom Smith
A state-funded charter school in North Carolina may not require female students to wear skirts because it counts as a state actor, the en banc U.S. [read post]