Search for: "People v. Shorts" Results 701 - 720 of 8,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Meanwhile, like all good movie franchises, they end with a victory, but also with a short teaser for the next episode that is already in the works. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:41 pm
But a case from last year, Brennan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:55 am by G.A. Napier
However, I believe it is a viable alternative for a narrow segment of people who are needing some legal protections but retain even a tiny note hope for their marriage. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Over the following decades theSupreme Court continued to recognize the importance of the right to counsel,ultimately concluding in 1984 in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
As any decent lawyer will tell you, tenuous pleas of human rights are typically given short shrift by judges. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:32 am
  Incidentally, if you have not read this short story, I highly recommend it, it is one of Poe's best and, along with two other Poe stories about C. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
In People v Hawkins (2008 NY Slip Op 09254 [11/25/08]) the Court of Appeals provided counsel with further guidance as to what is required to preserve errors for review as a matter of law. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:16 am by Buce
Abacus made it possible for more people to gamble on mortgages for no productive gain or loss. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Note also that publicly urging people to fire someone for his speech, even when the firing would be illegal, is likely constitutionally protected under Brandenburg v. [read post]