Search for: "Rodriguez v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 35 (1973). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
AS-10-CV-860-XR, but my review of the docket on PACER indicates that United States District Judge Xavier Rodriguez ordered the case remanded to the 38th District Court of Medina County, Texas on June 27, 2011. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Rodriguez (October 3) District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 19–21. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 10:06 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Rodriguez, “[t]he Trump administration wants the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Thus, the mere proof then that the injured worker was not legally able to work in the United States was enough to obtain the Suspension. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:51 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
After a jury convicted Christopher Castillo “of making a threat to injure or kill the President of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:38 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:20 am
Bell won in State v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:15 pm
While the Supreme Court recently held in Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:41 am
Rodriguez, supra. . . . [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
