Search for: "STATE v HAMMER" Results 701 - 720 of 865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:56 pm
For example, they barred the use of monikers such as "Heavy Hitters" or "the Hammer" that suggested the lawyer would get great results. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:09 am by SHG
The 2d Circuit has affirmed the district court decision in Alexander v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The State of Advertising Bob Garfield, Author, The Chaos Scenario; co-host, NPR’s On the Media NBC is doomed except as a cable channel: tech and simple economics undermine TV’s business model. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am by Erin Miller
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Brief for the federal respondents in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States Title: Hammer v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by David Schraub
The result is that constitutional updating occurs fitfully and perpetually under a shroud of potential illegitimacy.Consider the reaction to and eventual reversal of Hammer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am by Peter Kinder
Still, nowhere is it written that when the shells come out, the mark can’t take a hammer to them.Footnotes1 Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General iSlate, iTablet, IP! [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Hart A state appellate court has upheld the adoption of design guidelines that are intended to implement a City of Los Angeles redevelopment plan.PR/JSM Rivara LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:32 am by Ed Felten
Verdict: wrong. (9) As a result of the jury's guilty verdict in U.S. v. [read post]