Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 4:22 pm
Duffy in The Legal Intelligencer United States District Court Judge William Ditter, Jr. spent 3 pages describing the errors made in a post trial pleading by Puricelli in McKenna v City of Philadelphia which included mispellings such as "plaintf", "mocong papers" , "attoreys, "Ubited States" and all sorts of other mistakes. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:20 pm
" Christy v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
Spelling made-up words “Frac, Frack, or Hydrofrack? [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 7:55 am
(The case is docketed as 07A304, Emmett v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
The same problem faced the court recently in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:43 am
Gary Odom v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:51 am
McKerr v United Kingdom, at para. 111). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:17 am
" United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
Pulka v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Crawford explicitly declined to spell out a comprehensive definition of testimonial, but it stated that some statements qualify under any definition[, including] ex parte testimony at a preliminary hearing and statements taken by police officers in the course of interrogations. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:22 am
State, 2011 Tex. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
 Baze v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
Baze v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:42 am
The Court draws from the Seventh Circuit's ruling in Bloch v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
” Viewed together with the Ontario Divisional Court decision in Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:22 am
Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
The case of Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
An expansive reading of the Court’s recent decision could spell problems for these rules similar to those that have faced other attempts by states to impose more transparency on political speech (see, for instance, our article on the demise of certain of Maryland’s political regulations requiring that media outlets maintain public records of the purchase of pollical advertising accepted by such outlets). [read post]
