Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 701 - 720
of 3,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2016, 7:12 am
[W]hile Patent Owner’s argument that the United States 'directed and controlled the allegedly infringing activity' is not without relevance, it does not bear directly on the categories identified by the Supreme Court in [Taylor v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 1:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
Vishnu Kannan shared the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s unredacted opinion in Doe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
In the briefs, FI&C relied on its success in Taylor v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
Taylor (Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act) Pollard, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
See Ryan LLC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 9:17 am
Facebook to Taylor v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:13 pm
In Alliance for Responsible Planning v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
We have stated this rule in slightly different ways. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
CAFA Does Not Play Any "Tricks;" It Merely Provides For Removal Anytime Jurisdiction Is Ascertained.
1 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:49 am
Here, as in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit today vacated the order of Judge Taylor in ACLU v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Amendment to Civil Service Law §167(8) does not violate the compensation clause for certain judges set out in Article VI, §25[a] of the State Constitution Bransten v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08168, Court of AppealsIn 2011 the State-employee unions, in the course of collective bargaining, agreed to a percentage reduction to the State's employer contributions for health insurance to avoid layoff, salary freezes and unpaid furloughs.… [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:48 pm
In CMH Set and Finish, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that a probationary employee may be terminated at any time after the completing his or her minimum period of probation prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation [see Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904] unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14]. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
The CAFC panel had to distinguish Quantum Corp. v Rodine, PLC, 65 F.3d 1577 (Fed. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
Shane Taylor, [Maureen’s] witness, testified that he examined [her] computer. . . . [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.In contrast, in Outley v Upstate Med. [read post]
