Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 30,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Bar discipline, mostly secret in many states. [read post]
12 May 2021, 3:08 pm
Knick v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:16 am
The State appealed. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Specht v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court judgment, concluding that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in finding the settlement to be fair, adequate and reasonable.Download PDF file of in re Microsoft I-V [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:33 pm
§ 4A1.2(a)(2) is an issue of second impression across the breadth of the federal courts, it deserves more serious analysis than the judicial sleight of hand performed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Morgan and adopted by this court today. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
The court stated that ratios in excess of single digits are sometimes permissible when the compensatory damages are unusually small, but the court did not view the $15,000 award in this case as small enough to warrant a larger ratio. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:20 am
Allegedly.You (understandably) want to strike a deal with the United States, which has indicted you. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
By Eric Goldman Shropshire v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:01 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Troester v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:04 am
Because not every state that has an overtime requirement recognizes the HCE exemption, it is also important to confirm compliance with state law. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:47 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 3:31 pm
In Main Drug, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
., fairness, honesty, trustworthiness) and self-regarding concerns (material goods and services, leisure, prestige). [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:19 pm
Moore v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm
See also Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
