Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 7181 - 7200
of 13,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Even if you’re confident that the FCC has the correct contact information for your operation, it wouldn’t hurt to check, just to be sure. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:50 pm
(See, e.g., Bradley, supra, at pp. 1150-1153 [where theory of liability was employer's uniform policy violated labor laws by not authorizing employees to take meal and rest breaks, class certification is proper and fact some employees in fact took meal and rest breaks is a damage question that " 'will rarely if ever stand as a bar to certification' "].)Slip op., at 13. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 8:24 am
EBC licensed the nine bright and colourful artistic works and used them on various food products including biscuits, puffs and fiddlesticks.In 2019, Aldi undertook a re-design of its MAMIA range of baby food products. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 7:25 am
I add that unfair advantage has still been proven in cases where no intention to free-ride has been shown (see e.g. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
For instance, it does not include a nexus to personal information (see, e.g., “consumer health data” under Washington’s My Health, My Data Act, which is defined as personal information that identifies a consumer’s past, present, or future mental or physical health status). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
I am delighted to announce that the essays in Volume 16(1) of Emancipating the Mind: Bulletin of the Coalition for Peace & Ethics (Summer 2021) (ISSN 2689-0283 (Print); 2689-0291 (Online); ISBN 978-1-949943-06-1) are now available.This issue includes essays on Contemporary China--Heartland, Periphery, and Silk Roads. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
” In re Urban Renewal (City of Detroit v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Scotland, Northern Ireland), but is rather subject to re-examination by the competent court (e.g. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
See, e.g., R. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 5:27 am
Exploring Additional Options: If your injury was caused by a third party (e.g., a contractor or equipment manufacturer), your attorney can help you pursue additional compensation outside of the workers’ compensation system. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:50 am
TLDR If you’re just looking for quick answers about these contracts, here you go: The summary review immediately below assumes that you’re a commercial user and that you’re interfacing with these platforms via API, not through a consumer-facing chatbot. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 3:33 am
If you’re asking, “Does my wife get half of my savings? [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 3:33 am
If you’re asking, “Does my wife get half of my savings? [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:33 pm
For example, the Final Rule specifies that whether the employee is economically dependent on the potential joint employer, including factors traditionally used to establish whether a particular worker is a bona fide independent contractor (e.g., the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss, their investment in equipment and materials, etc.), are not relevant to determine joint employer liabili [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
This becomes more important in times of tension,l especially when two or more opposing systems seek advantage in their contests for re-adjusting the nature of the relationship between them. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
But the Summit also provided a convenient backdrop against which Chinese authorities might more effectively re-focus their energies on the deeper conceptualization and projection outward of their own imaginaries of legitimate constitutional systems. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:18 am
These efforts are particularly notable in the context of the developing conceptual regimes of human rights (e.g., Europe at a Crossroads; Respecting democracy, rule of law and human rights in the framework of the COVID-19 sanitary crisis). [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Such a mechanism could be capped (e.g. at 11, or 13) to keep the Court to a workable number. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm
See, e.g., Powell, 65 N.C. at 709 (defendant not charged with any prior crime); Worthy, 63 N.C. at 203 (defendant not charged with any crime); In re Tate, 63 N.C. 308 (1869) (defendant not charged with any crime); Gerard N. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
We’re sharing the results here in hopes that it will interest you as well and spur more research on how authors think about fair use. [read post]
