Search for: "Kennedy v. State" Results 7181 - 7200 of 8,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2008, 4:47 pm
Earlier this month the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:19 pm
  The question was posed in Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
Only one medical facility in the state provides abortion services, and Planned Parenthood essentially "imports" those doctors to the state. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
Riegel and the dreadful decision they may well make in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
Riegel and the dreadful decision they may well make in Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:41 pm
Robin Kundis Craig, Justice Kennedy and Ecosystem Services: A Functional Approach to Clean Water Act Jurisdiction after Rapanos, 38 Environmental Law Review 635 (2008) The United States Supreme Court’s most recent-and fractured-decision regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction, Rapanos v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 6:08 pm
Kennedy, 13 M.J. 465 (1982) (mem.); United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 2:16 am
Bidish Sarma has written a short article at the Yale Journal Pocket Part about the legacy of the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:29 am
  The piece is by Bidish Sarma and is titled "Still in Search of a Unifying Principle: What Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:56 am
  That wasn't enough for the State of Georgia. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
  The Court spent an hour Tuesday talking about different approaches, in Bartlett v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:38 am
"And with that Mickey Spillane-style writing, none other than Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court John Roberts as he dissented from the the petition for a writ of certiorari denied by the rest of the Supreme Court (except Justice Kennedy, who joined in Roberts' dissent) in the case entitled:  Pennsylvania v. [read post]