Search for: "Lowe v. State"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 9,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The reversal of the injunction came just two days after the court heard a speedy interlocutory appeal in the case (C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
The ruling was published yesterday (in Dutch), the same day that a German court gave short shrift to a Nokia v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am
Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments from the SEC and a mutual fund regarding the SEC’s decision to deny the fund’s application for an exemption for its method of accounting for potential deferred tax liability (Copley Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court held in Whitman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 9:29 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 12:30 am
Supreme Court’s 2012 decisions in Morrison v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Fifty years after the enactment of the Fair Housing Act (FHA), housing discrimination remains a national disgrace in the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:06 am
.'" Indeed, the Court has stated—and regularly restated—that government officials violate clearly established law only when "'[t]he contours of [a] right [are] sufficiently clear' that every 'reasonable official would [have understood] that what he is doing violates that right.'" The challenge of identifying clearly established law is heightened further by the Court's decision in Pearson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 am
This morning the Mannheim Regional Court ordered a stay of a Samsung v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 3:13 pm
TransCanada Hydro Northeast v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
According to the French IP code, M&S was not entitled to demand the cancellation of those goods and services not cited against it by ISMS, and therefore the claims for cancellation should be accepted as far as they apply to those goods and services cited in the infringement claim but rejected for those not so cited.On the validity of CTM 5410998 SIMPLYRecognizing the need to consider the validity of the marks by reference to the average consumer in all EU member states, the court… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:35 am
This week, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a sharply divided 4-3 opinion in Freshwater v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:53 am
ISK Biocides, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 10:05 am
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
Kneipp's position was that the documents produced by Patou did not provide evidence of JOY's reputation in France, because market share is a critical factor in evidencing a mark's reputation and the perfume Joy by Jean Patou was: (a) sold only by selected luxury and prominent retailers; and (b) had generated only a low turnover in 2016, 2017 and 2018, with a steady decrease since 2016. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:51 am
Hillman Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The case was Schwaner v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 11:30 am
Nielsen v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:48 pm
Aside from the obvious readership of IP practitioners, litigants in person -- especially those in the SCT -- should find this book incredibly helpful in handling very low value matters themselves. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:42 pm
Requiring only that police state that they intend to “identify and/or verify commonalities” in the data on thousands of people is a low bar. [read post]
