Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 7181 - 7200 of 12,219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It took a long time to chip away at that and have, for example, a defensive registration process for similar goods.Part of this may have to do with the technology of registration, it was always understood you’d have to carve out some way of distinguishing what goods a registrant would get protection for and what goods they wouldn’t: never thought sensible to protect across all classes.When this technology gets transported through the rest of the empire, it seems to have been… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
 Last year, the Ninth Circuit took the case en banc. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:03 am by John Hopkins
Morgan Stanley (2005WL 679071) case and the missteps of the Zubulake v UBS Warburg [220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)} case, I am satisfied we have moved well beyond the Micron vs. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:35 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Tessa recently highlighted the case of Masih v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Here, when the state could not locate two witnesses and the judge refused to grant a continuance, the prosecution took its ball and went home: the prosecutor actually stated “the State is not participating in this case. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
In May 2006 when she was in the hospital having had surgery, he entered her room and took a photo of her while she was asleep or unconscious.Over time and into 2007, Roberts preoccupation with and stalking of Noftsinger became pervasive and more aggressive, even ang[ry]. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm
 And which proclaims on its web site that its principal "Values" are that "We work with great people. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
The review focuses "largely on the controversial decision issued by the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]