Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 23,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2017, 5:11 am
Gravelle v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
According to a Minnesota federal court in Mobile Mini, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:57 pm
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:14 pm
The money KatThe recent interim Patents Court decision of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (2) Sandoz Limited (and Ohers) [2017] EWHC 1433 (Pat) provides guidance on the issue. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 8:48 am
Recently, a Texas Court of Appeals in Cooper Valves, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 6:33 am
In the case of Ore v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
The UK Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative earlier this week in its judgment in R v M & Ors [2017] UKSC 58.Issued in the context of an interlocutory appeal in criminal proceedings, this ruling concerned the proper construction of section 92(1) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
“Selling Tickets To Courthouses”: Kanye West’s Touring Company Sues Insurer For Withholding Coverage
4 Aug 2017, 10:35 am
In Very Good Touring, Inc. v. [read post]
“Selling Tickets To Courthouses”: Kanye West’s Touring Company Sues Insurer For Withholding Coverage
4 Aug 2017, 10:35 am
In Very Good Touring, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:42 am
We lease and sell clean, safe, and solid storage containers and offices. . . [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:08 am
In a 1946 Supreme Court case Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
The case, Ag Spectrum v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
In Potter v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Yesterday, almost two years after hearing arguments, the Supreme Court of South Carolina finally issued its decision in the case of The Protestant Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:39 am
Boggs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
The court disagrees: “HomeAway merely provides a venue for others to sell or provide lodging, but does not provide the actual facility where people can ‘lodge.'” See the uncited SF Housing Rights Committee v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:06 am
” [2] See SEC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 5:47 am
In addition, there are a number of compliance issues, such as conflicts of interest, cross-selling and considerations regarding the commission structure. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 3:24 am
On appeal from [2016] EWCA Crim 1617 The case considered whether a criminal offence can be committed under the Trade Marks Act 1994, s 92(1)(b) or (c) (selling, offering for sale or distribution/possession with a view) where the proprietor of the registered trade mark has given its consent to the application of the sign which is its registered trade mark or has itself applied its own registered trade mark to the goods, but has not given its consent to the sale, distribution or possession of… [read post]
