Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 8,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Proposed amendmentsCurrently Rule 2019 states that “every entity or committee representing more than one creditor or equity security holder. . .shall file a verified statement setting forth” their economic interests. [27] The proposed amendments are simple. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:39 pm
Huber v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:42 am
Interesting post at Persuasive Authorities on the implications of Holder v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
Thank you.Declaration of Copyright Self-Regulation of the Chinese Internet SectorIn order to safeguard copyright and related right holders' lawful rights and interest, stimulate the healthy development of the Internet industry, safeguard social and public interests, the representatives of the Internet sector make the following declaration of self-regulation to society:I, Internet enterprises shall undertake their obligations to society, earnestly respect and propagate State… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm
Holder, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
In Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
The first case, Holder v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
This essentially means that all copyright holders, regardless of where they are located, need to register their works with the USCO before filing suit in the country if they wish to seek statutory damages.Needless to say, considering that most nations have no formalities at all for copyright protection, this decision is going to cause some major headache for foreign copyright holders as they try to enforce their rights within the U.S.What HappenedThe case in question is Elsevier… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
" Apache Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
( R. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:09 pm
" There must be some act by which the defendant purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities in the State. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Text of the complaint and the proposed consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm
More on Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:48 am
Rudnicki v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Bruch v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) US Patents –… [read post]
