Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 7181 - 7200 of 16,400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The lengths to which the courts allow the Fourth Amendment to be stretched to its breaking point
20 Apr 2016, 10:16 pm by Jon Katz
U.S. v. [read post]
Underdog Blog - http://katzjustice.com/blog/
Williams v. Pennsylvania - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
20 Apr 2016, 11:28 am by The Federalist Society
On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments inWilliams v. [read post]
Federalist Society SCOTUScast - http://fedsoc.server326.com/audio/SCOTUScast/SCOTUScast.xml
Argument preview: Political favors as crimes
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am by Lyle Denniston
While he led the Virginia state government, McDonnell was often regarded by the political community as one of the GOP’s most promising young figures, assumed to be a strong candidate one day to be at least vice president of the United States. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Clarifying what the TPP IP provisions mean in Canada for the Innovative Life Sciences Sector
20 Apr 2016, 5:58 am by Declan Hamill
Misconception #4 – Enough is being done under the current Canadian IP system to support life sciences competition and innovation Strong intellectual property protects life sciences innovation. [read post]
Copyright, Intellectual Property, Computer, Internet, e-Commerce Law - http://www.barrysookman.com
Argument preview: “The first thing we do, let’s pay all the lawyers!” – Justices return, again, to standards for ordering attorney’s fees in IP cases
19 Apr 2016, 7:22 am by Ronald Mann
Next week, the argument in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court oral argument in US v. Texas
18 Apr 2016, 12:30 pm by Ilya Somin
(Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images) The Supreme Court held oral arguments today in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
“Lumpiness” insufficient When the Ship is Going Down
18 Apr 2016, 11:36 am by David Cosgrove
  See Schaaf v. [read post]
Cosgrove Law Securities and Investment Blog - http://securitiesandinvestmentblog.blogspot.com/
Pending Supreme Court Patent Cases 2016 (April 18 Update)
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
In Cooper v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
What If Feinstein-Burr Passes?
18 Apr 2016, 6:19 am by Paul Rosenzweig
   In Bernstein v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] What will the chief justice do in U.S. v. Texas (the immigration case)?
18 Apr 2016, 5:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This morning, the Supreme Court will hear United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Letter from AmeriKat: Are patent trolls a problem in the ITC?
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
 Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Hot Air Balloon Operator Not Entitled to Immunity under Recreational Use Statute
15 Apr 2016, 9:34 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
In the case, Roberts v. [read post]
Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.washingtondcinjurylawyerblog.com/
Lain on Plessy, Buck v. Bell, Korematsu--and Chemerinsky
15 Apr 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
United States. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Future-proofing the Investigatory Powers Bill
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
Cyberleagle - http://cyberleagle.blogspot.com/
Future-proofing the Investigatory Powers Bill
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
Cyberleagle - http://cyberleagle.blogspot.com/
Future-proofing the Investigatory Powers Bill
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
Cyberleagle - http://cyberleagle.blogspot.com/
In Re Marilyn Scheer (9th Cir. - April 14, 2016)
14 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
 There's this case called Kelly v. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
JamPAC: A Hack For An Ailing Political System
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
A Harvard Lawyer In Magic City - http://beckandlee.wordpress.com
FAQ: Apple, the FBI, and Zero Days
14 Apr 2016, 8:02 am by Andrew Crocker
  Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
Deeplinks Blog - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks
Wrong, But Not Quite Wrong Enough
14 Apr 2016, 7:23 am by Andrew Delaney
State v. [read post]
Supreme Court of Vermont Law Blog - http://scovlegal.blogspot.com/