Search for: "Thomas v. Held" Results 7181 - 7200 of 7,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
Scholars of the Supreme Court have pointed out that the current Court is an anomaly in American history in being composed entirely of members who came to the Court after service (some of it relatively brief - as to which see Clarence Thomas and John Roberts) on the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
Two justices – Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito – indicated that they would have denied the requests by the FDA and Danco, which manufactures mifepristone and joined the case to defend the drug. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Jonathan Movroydis
So, the framers of the Constitution were doubly emphatic that the power of the purse was to be held by Congress. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:35 am by INFORRM
  The Courts have since added that the conduct must be ‘oppressive and unreasonable’ (Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1233). [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:02 am
Thomas Aquinas, developed elaborate criteria of just war:  it must have a just cause, it must be the last resort, it must be launched by legitimate authority, it must be launched with rightful intention (meaning that the just cause can't be merely a pretext), it must have a reasonable chance of success, and the war aim must be proportional to the expected devastation of the war. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Singer, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP (moderator) Thomas A. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am by John Palley
(f) Sunset Not To Apply- (1) Subsection (a) of section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 is amended by striking ‘this Act’ and all that follows and inserting ‘this Act (other than title V) shall not apply to taxable, plan, or limitation years beginning after December 31, 2012. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
I am delighted to share the video recording of the  event recently sponsored by the Penn State Law Federalist Society: "Natural Law and the US Constitutional Order" which was held at Penn State law 12 April 2022. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
  Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development  of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
The proposal to use electricity provoked legal wrangles between the Edison and Westinghouse companies which promoted, respectively, direct and alternating current.Following the first electrocution in 1890, Dr Alfred Southwick, the chair of the commission which recommended the electric chair, was reported as saying that "we live in a higher civilisation from this day"(5) though Thomas Edison reportedly "rebuked the doctors and said it was a mistake to have let them handle the… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
Proof of Life’s screenplay was partly inspired by Thomas Hargrove’s book The Long March to Freedom, which recounts how the release of the once-kidnapped Hargrove was negotiated by Thomas Clayton, the founder of his eponymous kidnap-for-ransom consultancy Clayton Consultants (now part of risk management firm, Triple Canopy). [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Caroline A. Crenshaw
Thank you Hal [Scott] for that kind introduction and for inviting me to speak today. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]