Search for: "United States v. House" Results 7181 - 7200 of 12,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Tejinder Singh
United States, we got as close to unanimity as the week allowed. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
 The agreement provided that upon satisfaction of the conditions of the agreement, the City would convey the property to Laurel Place and provide it with a loan, and Laurel Place would construct the housing units. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm by Suzanne Ito
Pineda-Moreno, a Ninth Circuit case that could play a significant role in determining how broadly the Supreme Court's recent GPS tracking decision, United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm by Steven Calabresi
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 7:18 pm by Steve
The juxtaposition of what the Constitution says about states entering the Union and what it does not say about them leaving, indicates that the door to the Union swings in but not out.Dorf also quotes the 1868 case of Texas v White where the Court said "The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm by WSLL
’”  2004 WY 8, ¶ 22, 84 P.3d 320, 331-32 (Wyo. 2004) (quoting United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am by Robin Wilson
United States leave little doubt that a U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am by Marty Lederman
 (Attorney General Wirt for instance, opined in 1827 that the President could order the discontinuance of a “vexatio[us]” suit in the name of the United States if it was “wholly unfounded in law. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 4:08 am by Daniel Spiegel
In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s momentous decision in Trump v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 10:03 am by Liz Dye
In doing so, Defendants violated the Separation of Powers of the United States Constitution. [read post]