Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2007, 7:15 am
Once it does pass, and the Governor receives this gigantic bill, he has a week to review it, but his options are extremely limited. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:14 pm
I’m not exactly sure. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
"They say, 'There's no way I'm going to take the time to learn this, and, besides, what I do does not fit into the list of codes.'" Electronic legal billing software providers have also been overwhelmed with the sheer number and variety of billing code sets.IP Task-Based Billing Comes to CanadaA similar Canadian UTBMS project was instigated at the suggestion of the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC). [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 1:20 pm
He does not seem to have the same reservations. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 10:35 pm
Does it follow that one is motivated to do X? [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:48 am
Plaintiff filed as a putative class action on the grounds that "she, and the members of the Sub-Classes she seeks to represent, were and will continue to be denied claims for benefits for certain charges they commonly and typically incurr(ed), and which claims Conseco consistently deny(ied), for their radiation treatment and/or chemotherapy treatment. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 7:00 pm
The Judge may hang the Sheriff (and Paris) out to dry, but I think if he does, it's because he's catering to public opinion, not the law. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:27 am
Any decision declaring "this complaint is deficient because it does not allege X" is a candidate for summary reversal, unless X is on the list in Fed. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:01 pm
law degree from law school X carries far less weight than a JD from the same law schools.* A well known cultural fact, that often stuns non-Americans, is that tuition really pays as much for the placement services schools offer as it does for the education itself (a cynic would say: more so for the placement services). [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 8:25 am
You only look at whether a legitimate investigation was taking place, it's my view the x-referencing does apply, as it relates to the obstruction. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
If I could have batted my eyelashes I would have. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 7:43 am
So how does this apply to media mergers? [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:05 pm
I may give up X, but I better get Y. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
This case presents an issue of exceptional importance: When does the statute of limitations begin to run on a 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:47 pm
I suppose every parcel of land is "potentially" subject to a public prescriptive easement, which makes the Commission's rationale all the more suspect, and this case appears to me to be a brazen attempt at a land grab, couched in the language of regulation. [read post]
30 May 2007, 5:56 am
When their client does get busy again, that client will not experience being a client of Lateral X; the client will experience being a client of your firm. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:08 am
And I agree - if it is legitimate to signal "I have the same qualities as Brand X," it shouldn't matter how that signal is communicated. [read post]
29 May 2007, 12:22 pm
I don't see any basis for arguing that, based on the conduct I outlined in our hypothetical, X "solicited" Doe to commit suicide. [read post]
26 May 2007, 9:45 am
[Still another clever graphical insert]Does this tell us anything? [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:37 am
Damania does not receive a green card soon, he will be better off to leave the United States and take the couple's skills to another country. [read post]
