Search for: "David O"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 7,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am
In Foreign Policy, Siobhan O’Grady lets us in on a little secret: “joining ISIS isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Affirmed.In Estate of Martha O'Neal, Therese Newkirk v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
Would the country really have been better off with such suppressions, in favor of the mush written by the O'Connor plurality in that case? [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:56 am
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Judge Orders Predictive Coding Over Plaintiff Objection – bit.ly/Ic9lx7 (Evan Koblentz) Admissibility of Scientific Literature in the Internet Age – bit.ly/Icah4k (Andrew Kaufman) Allergies, eDiscovery and Karma: Yes, The Rules Apply to Law Firms, Too – bit.ly/ILU3N4 (Dennis Kiker) ‘Briggs’ and Emerging Standards on Government eDiscovery Obligations – bit.ly/HYwzUI (Norman Simon… [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 12:00 am
“Public Service Legal Tech in the Data.Gov Era“, featured David Colarusso (lawyer and data scientist), Michael Robak (current CTO at Kansas City School of Law), and Adam Ziegler (of the Library Innovation Lab at Harvard). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The trial in libel claim brought by journalist Natalie O’Brien against ABC before McCallum J in the Supreme Court of New South Wales has concluded. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:49 am
NaN, 468 words, O'Flynn to remain sheriff, defeats criticism, Greene, David Andreatta ... [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:18 pm
In 2015, in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The first states that “[n]o surrender pursuant to this part is necessary to terminate any parental rights of the woman who carried the child to term under the circumstances described in this subdivision (48) and no adoption of the child by the biological parent(s) is necessary. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
The expansion of "Prior User Rights" under AIA good for business USPTO Director Kappos defendingthe prior user rights defence beforethe House of Representatives Last week, USPTO Director David Kappos, was before the House of Representative’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet and Committee on the Judiciary on the hot topic of “prior user rights” defence following singing into law of the Leahy-Smith… [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:06 am
David Rejeski, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, did not attend the conference, but submitted the presentation "Building a new social contract for 21st Century products. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
We are 30-plus years into the “Daubert” era, in which federal district courts are charged with gatekeeping the relevance and reliability of scientific evidence. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
Nicola Peart responds to David Hart QC’s post and asks whether human rights based climate change litigation is really so radical. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
Civil Prac & Remedies Code §22.021(2)(B)) extends protection to scholars; whilst the Californian Court of Appeals famously, in O’Grady v Superior Court 44 Cal Rptr 3d 72 (Cal Ct App 2006), interpreted the word ‘periodical’ to find that online journals were protected by state shield laws. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 3:32 pm
"Basically, it is giving up on the mask mandate," said Lawrence O. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:29 am
Over at Threat Level, David Kravets and Robert McMillan write that revelations of the backdoor built into the NSA’s number generator cast a pall over the entire tech industry. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:42 am
Julian Duplain, Kim Bellware, David Walker and Akilah Johnson report for the Washington Post. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
Drafting Employment Agreements to Comply with New State Laws and Pending Legislation Restricting Enforceability of Non-Competes David J. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 4:12 pm
Chris Gillespie et David Elliott, ont alors intenté une action en justice afin de faire annuler la marque de commerce GOOGLE. [read post]
