Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 12,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 3:09 pm
According to court documents and statements made in court, Scott Norris Johnson owned and operated Disabled Access Prevents Injury Inc (DAPI), a legal services corporation. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:17 am
However, companies, and governments, should first consider whether the likely benefits to them outweigh the potential costs. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:38 pm
If our first priority is to ensure that regulations' benefits exceed their costs, what should we make of the current set of GHG policies under the CAA? [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:12 am
Unilateral transfer of unit workCity of Rome v PERB, 283 AD2d 817 The Civil Service Employees Association, Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO Inc., City of Rome Unit [CSEA], filed an improper practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] alleging that Rome had impermissibly assigned unit work to nonunit employees without first bargaining with CSEA. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 10:41 am
Humphreys and Associates, and Lakeview Healthcare Systems, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:12 am
However, two days after the Respondent made the first payment under the proposed schedule for future payments, the Appellant informed the Respondent that this constituted a sum inferior to the licence fee due. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
This review will not change the expected costs or public health benefits of the rule. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:00 am
Marriott Hotels, Inc., 23 Cal. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Trustees, South California Baker Drivers Fund (07-94), on whether providers of benefits for employee benefit plans under ERISa must return any surplus in payments beyond actually payments for benefits. ** Compaq Computer (now Hewlett-Packard) v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:27 pm
The class action inquiry in these circumstances will consist of two parts: (1) whether the putative class member is entitled to the benefit in the first instance (i.e. was he or she properly classified); and (2) whether there was a uniform policy to deprive the class member of the benefit. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:21 am
H Rehab, Inc., 77 So. 3d 724, 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (granting review of trial court order and remanding case “with instructions that State Farm is not required to produce the surveillance video/DVD prior to taking the deposition”). [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
Recent court decisions have eradicated the first benefit by requiring employers to pay for almost 100% of the arbitration costs and allowing virtually full discovery in the arbitration proceedings. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
After the ALJ awarded benefits, the Employer and Carrier appealed to the Benefits Review Board (“BRB”) the first time. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:25 am
First, last week, the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:39 pm
"We can't lose sight of the benefit of this product, the public health benefit is clear. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:27 pm
The class action inquiry in these circumstances will consist of two parts: (1) whether the putative class member is entitled to the benefit in the first instance (i.e. was he or she properly classified); and (2) whether there was a uniform policy to deprive the class member of the benefit. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:15 pm
As a condition of his release on bail, Brown voluntarily surrendered those firearms and agreed both that the firearms would be held by Riley’s Sport Shop, Inc., pending resolution of the charges, and that he would pay all storage charges incurred. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:20 am
The proposed rulemaking was careful drafted by the USPTO to justify its demand for additional evidence in both (1) benefits to third parties (its implicitly primary reason) and (2) benefits for the examination process (its implicitly secondary reason). [read post]
