Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 7201 - 7220 of 15,523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm by Jeremy
This got short shrift from the judge who quoted the Hoffman v Dare judgment. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 11:44 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Once you’ve figured out your allowances, you may want your employer to withhold even more. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am by Robin Shea
What do employers need to know about the Supreme Court’s pregnancy accommodation decision last week in Young v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
But while Google gets on with the practicalities of responding to some 720 requests per day, the rest of us are left trying to figure out if the judgment really did come out of nowhere and what it all means. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:48 am by Daniel Schwartz
Supreme Court decided one of the most anticipated cases in the court’s docket this year — at least for employment lawyers — in Young v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm by Corey Brettschneider
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am by Kent Scheidegger
  If fully informed, I think most people would agree with the 1989 rule of Penry v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm by Florian Mueller
(The Supreme Court won't necessarily follow it anyway, but it wouldn't have asked if it didn't care.)One can only speculate about the first question and make a more or less educated guess about the second point.Everybody who is interested in software IP issues knows that non-technical people face particular difficulties in figuring them out. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm by Giles Peaker
Hardy, R (on the application of) v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2015] EWHC 890 Oh, we have been waiting for this one. [read post]