Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 7,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
However, this principle was shattered in 2002 by the House of Lords’ decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Limited [2003] 1 AC 32. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:05 pm
The defendant was too far from the house to be able to obtain evidence or contraband. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:34 pm
Under the new legislation, there are two potential ways of calculating how close to the water a structure can be erected.. . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
Rush v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
DeMayo v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
US v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:03 pm
Doe v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
Although no one reported seeing sparks fly, the attorneys in Adlerstein v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
How close does the threat have to be, and how severe can the infliction of pain be? [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
” The Ninth Circuit interpreted what this means at the end of May in the closely-followed case of Perfect 10 v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Martinez-Larraga, No. 06-40489 "Convictions and sentences for drug-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) the prosecutor commented on their post-arrest, pre-trial, silence during its rebuttal closing argument; 2) the government improperly bolstered its witnesses' testimony during closing argument; and 3) the district court erred by denying one defendant a downward adjustment of his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 3B1.2. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 8:55 pm
Mike Dillon thinks technology in-house counsel shouldn’t cave in to “patent trolls”…for the good of the industry. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 2:29 am
How can we expect real people to live in unreal houses? [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Ohio; Cox v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 29, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
" The Court concluded the role of the Courts is the narrow one of determining if the exercise of eminent domain is "rationally related to a conceivable public purpose" (citing Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
" The Court concluded the role of the Courts is the narrow one of determining if the exercise of eminent domain is "rationally related to a conceivable public purpose" (citing Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
