Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 28,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
The challenged policy removed prisoners from the Ramadan program if they were observed taking meals during Ramadan from the regular diet line at regular mealtimes. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
The Review Board drew on the test set out in Star Athletica LLC v Varsity Brands Inc (137 S. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Bottom line, there was no tort upon which to predicate medical monitoring. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:39 am
Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui V. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am
At yesterday’s oral argument in Murr v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:11 pm
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:40 am
Moore v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:22 am
Delta Air Lines (Case No. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 7:39 am
Additionally, as recently highlighted in K-fee v Nespresso (Case No. 22-2042, Fed. [read post]
26 Jan 2025, 1:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Layoff, preferred lists and reinstatement of public employees of the State as an employer and employees of its political subdivisions and schoolsSource: The Anatomy of a Layoff by Harvey Randall, Esq., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am
And of course, if Perry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 2:40 pm
The recent case of Burton v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:29 am
The question the Justices confronted in Trevino v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:05 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
