Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 20,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2023, 8:32 pm
United Kingdom Judgment in Light of the Euratom Treaty’s Drafting History ESIL Corner Seline Trevisanut, Machiko Kanetake & Cedric Ryngaert, The In/ Ex-clusiveness of International Law: Some Remarks on the 17th Annual Conference of the European Society of International Law by the Local Organizers E. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 11:07 am
Recently, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in the Booking.com decision held that a generic .com domain name can obtain a trademark registration under certain conditions. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
After all, as a circuit judge wrote in 2009, “[t]he Judicial Conference of the United States for almost 20 years, and the Sentencing Commission for almost 10 years, have pleaded with the judiciary committees of Congress to do something about the serious injustices that these long, mandatory minimum sentences impose – to no avail. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
We therefore follow our ordinary practice of remanding so that the Court of Appeals can reconsider, under the proper standard, whether the relevant claims in the ’753 patent are sufficiently definite. [...].Id. at *14 (some internal citations omitted).ConclusionFor the reasons stated, we vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.Nautilus, Inc. at… [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:12 am
Dohme v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Although the United States suffered a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception—a federal law passed in 1873 restricted the sale and circulation of contraception among other “obscene” things—that era more or less ended in 1965 when the Supreme Court ruled in Griswold v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm
According to the Uniform Crimes Reporting Program, there were over eleven million arrests in the United States in 2009, down from over fourteen million in 2005. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
Long and Todd F. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
The third section of the article focuses on ongoing litigation in Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State and Al Rawi v Secretary of State, where the Claimants attempt to expose the role played by the British Government in their detention at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:54 pm
They want to stay in the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 1:02 pm
Retained in the new Clean Water Rule is the exclusion of PCC from the definition of “waters of the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
It took 30 years, but they played the long game. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Sharpe); holding that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:42 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 7:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
