Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 16,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm
On the argument that s.23 and 24 allow people entitled to be registered as owners to deal with the property as if they are the registered owner, such that s.29(4) has the meaning that the grant of a lease has effect as if the disposition were registered at the time of grant, it was noted in Redstone that this was a curious effect. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm
On the argument that s.23 and 24 allow people entitled to be registered as owners to deal with the property as if they are the registered owner, such that s.29(4) has the meaning that the grant of a lease has effect as if the disposition were registered at the time of grant, it was noted in Redstone that this was a curious effect. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
I was right that the court would not grant review in the case. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:18 am
Dreier, 09-10371 FREE WITH REGISTRATIONAppellate Division, Fourth DepartmentHealth Law Funeral Director's Conviction Affirmed, No Good Faith Exception in Anatomical Gift Section of Public Health Law People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
” Court granted motion. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
In granting review and reversing, the Supreme Court made the following key points: Its earlier decision in Friends of Sierra Madre v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:50 am
Flag of Sri Lanka Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 10:12 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:26 am
” Nix v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
Full story: The Telegraph.CASESRe C (Contact: Appeal) [2012] EWCA (14 November 2012)Local authority granted a s 34(4) order permitting a cessation of contact between the father and children. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 2:02 am
It's even worse when people believe that one factor is static while others are dynamic, only because that particular combination of static and dynamic elements would benefit them.As one of the attendees of the 2019 FTC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
Brooks v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:45 am
The Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Rock River Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm
As for Huawei, I just remember that in their dispute with ZTE, they won one Mannheim case and the merits part of one of their two Dusseldorf cases (otherwise the court wouldn't even have referred Huawei v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:14 pm
"Stephan Palmer v. [read post]
