Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 7,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 7:04 am
Key Points and Implications For Transfer Compliance As already stated, the DPC decision largely repeats key elements of the Schrems II ruling about U.S. law not providing “essentially equivalent” protection to EU law and the limitations of SCCs (including the updated 2021 version). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 5:14 am
The case, Garland v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:03 pm
., a Juvenile v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The case then went back to the district court for a determination of damages – but in the meantime, the Court decided the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:26 pm
The case in question: In re Victorio or Victorio v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
The negotiating parties are committed to issuing in the very near future the version of the ACTA text which has emerged from the conclusion of the 11th round, it seems. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:20 pm
What this book does not do is to warn the casual reader that it is confined to the experience, the history and the analysis of the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:10 pm
The Court issued the 5-4 decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:47 pm
What you need to do then is get a court official to actually go round and physically move them out. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 4:24 am
The next time my group met at a big, informal dinner, I bought the first round of drinks. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:18 am
The style of the case is, Farmers Group v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:50 am
There must be some fairly annoyed people roaming round Alicante today following the publication in the Curia website of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling on OHIM's appeal in Case C-273/05 P, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Celltech R&D Ltd. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 8:11 am
The shrillness of these executed-but-innocent claims is matched only by their mendacity, as Justice Scalia demonstated in his devastating concurrence in Kansas v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
And unkind reader of the evolving dispute over the Louboutin red sole trade mark in the United States might be forgiven for saying that murky rules of unclear application are found there too. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 8:23 am
Reply briefs in the FCC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:37 am
Merpel will get round to completing it soon, once she has finished trying to recall whether any other United Nations agency has taken the trouble to ask everyone what they think of it. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:01 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
It stems from a 1966 Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Amchem v. [read post]
