Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 7201 - 7220 of 23,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 7:10 pm by Sara Skiff
Droid v. iPhone: Giving BlackBerry a Run For Lawyers' Money Cheap and Fast May Define the Law Firm of the Future Sell Your Legal Skills as Art, Not Labor Don't miss this issue or future issues. [read post]
19 May 2009, 3:22 pm
[ProfessorBainbridge] * Red State v. [read post]
The technical standards, in accordance with Article 6(7) of the Securitisation Regulation, specify the risk retention requirements and, in particular: i) requirements on the modalities of retaining risk, ii) the measurement of the level of retention, iii) the prohibition of hedging or selling the retained interest, iv) the conditions for retention on a consolidated basis, v) the conditions for exempting transactions based on a clear, transparent and accessible index, vi) the… [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Just sit back and relax, as we review the case of Fernandez v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 10:01 am
Ambassador to the United Nations, said at the Security Council (right) that his country opposed sanctions against South Africa on the ground that sanctions were "bad law and bad policy," but added that the United States would stop selling military matériel to the apartheid regime by year's end.... 1984, a British businessman won his legal action when the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Malone v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:51 am
Teleflex.The AP noted:Bristol-Myers and Sanofi had initially promised Apotex they wouldn't sell Plavix without a label as a so-called "authorized generic" to undercut Apotex sales. [read post]
9 May 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
-less TPP https://t.co/KhXihXrTbq -> Cloud vs. on-premises: Finding the right balance https://t.co/yXrBSHOqjD -> Takeaways From VHT V. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 10:59 am by Joe Mullin
The injunction by US District Judge Lucy Koh is part of the long-running Apple v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:02 pm
The workers claim IPALCO's top officers reaped more than $70 million by selling IPALCO stock while employees were left in the dark about AES stock's unreliability.The decision in this case, Nelson v. [read post]