Search for: "So" Results 7201 - 7220 of 890,266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Subsection 1512(c)(2) broadens this prohibition to anyone who “otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
They will also examine the responsibility of USG to protect US personnel from attacks by foreign actors, and the extent to which USG may have failed to do so, including complicity in obscuring the truth. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:44 pm by Sandy T. Fox
In doing so, the court emphasized that once an agreement is incorporated into a final judgment, any relief from the agreement must be sought under Rule 12.540(b). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:44 pm by Julia Stein
Reviewing courts may take EPA’s views into account—but are not obligated to do so. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:12 pm by Tom Smith
So out of desperation, they put blusher on Old Joe, fed him lines they prayed he would remember, and sent him out in a wretched bid to secure their own political clout and cultural hegemony. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:42 pm
It's a grid; so many years of experience plus a master's degree, for example, means you're paid $X.Susan George worked first as a teacher for five years, and then worked as a teacher for the Susanville Elementary School District for seven years, so those years (5 + 7) put her on "Step 12" of the relevant salary schedule. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:30 pm by Tom Smith
I personally pay zero attention to Lawrence Tribe’s legal opinions, the same way I couldn’t care less what Thomas Friedman or David Ignatius or any newspaper or magazine editor in American has to say about foreign policy or any other subject—because no one does, because they’re all so obviously in the tank. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:51 pm by News Desk
In some cases, however, diarrhea may be so severe that patients require hospitalization. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Christopher J. Walker
On workability, the majority is not entirely wrong, as the Court has grafted on so many steps, exceptions, and confusions over the years. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm by vanasse_admin
Appeal to the Commonwealth Court If the WCAB denies your claim, you can get a review of the denial through the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, but you must do so within 30 days from the date of the WCAB’s decision and order. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm by vanasse_admin
Appeal to the Commonwealth Court If the WCAB denies your claim, you can get a review of the denial through the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, but you must do so within 30 days from the date of the WCAB’s decision and order. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:47 pm by The Murray Law Firm
The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm by The Murray Law Firm
 The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided: Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property, and, if so, were any security measures added after any prior incidents? [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm by The Murray Law Firm
The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:30 pm by The Murray Law Firm
The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:17 pm by Arkady Itkin
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeal held that section 42 USC 1981 prohibits employer from discriminating against United States citizens, because an employer that does so gives one class of people – noncitizens, or perhaps some group of noncitizens – a greater right to make contract than “white citizens”. [read post]