Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 9,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 5:52 am
In respect of Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Doudna states in his supporting affidavit that he did not write, post, or even read that report at the time. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
In terms of potential impact, the case of Sorrell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
Pila v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:35 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down a 6-3 decision in Sorrell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:16 am
Sorrell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Knibbs provide a letter from a doctor stating that she no longer has any symptoms of depression, and her diabetes fully under control was discriminatory. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:25 pm
By Ben Wolf* and Jeff Wasserstein – Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court in today’s 6-3 decision in Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:41 pm
On June 23, 2011, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
Now why did Vermont doctors petition the state to limit access to prescriber records? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm
Jane wrote an amicus brief in IMS v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
The issue was the conflict between a Vermont state law and the process of detailing: Pharmaceutical manufacturers promote their drugs to doctors through a process called “detailing. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
The case of Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
The Court determined, quite rightly, that the state just doesn’t like what the pharmaceutical representatives say to the doctors and wants to silence them. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
” Id. at 19.Scratch that flattop.Second, that some doctors were annoyed by pharmaceutical detailing isn't a justification for the discriminatory exercise of state power. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
But in Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
09-1039), and Actavis, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The opinion is Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
A lawsuit was filed in state court in California yesterday challenging the San Francisco ballot measure that seeks to ban circumcision. [read post]
