Search for: "State v. Word" Results 7201 - 7220 of 40,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-8532, for Reynolds v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
In other words, the argument based on the Judge’s failure to take proper account of personal injury damages faces formidable difficulties. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:35 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In relation to the arguments concerning the EIR 2004 Lord Neuberger considered that in the light of the wording of arts 6.1-6.3 of the 2003 Directive it would be impermissible for the executive to have another attempt at preventing disclosure, and therefore EIR 2004, reg 18, is incompatible with art 6 of the Directive. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:17 pm by Giles Peaker
The excellent Liz Davies of Garden Court tackled the Court of Appeal decisions in MA & Ors and the benefit cap judgment in SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 156. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:17 pm by Giles Peaker
The excellent Liz Davies of Garden Court tackled the Court of Appeal decisions in MA & Ors and the benefit cap judgment in SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 156. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
” In other words, most of the language requiring long, temporal periods of disability after an auto accident are now removed. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
This is because the statute specifically states the telephone must be used in a manner that allows for `hands-free listening and talking. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm by INFORRM
Although noting that states do have a margin of appreciation in this regard, it was also made clear, citing Perna v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:14 pm by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
Today, the United States Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Hamilton v. [read post]