Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 7221 - 7240 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2008, 3:40 am
Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc. et al. (2007) 149 Cal.App. 4th 285, 290-291 (certified for partial publication). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by WIMS
THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS House Republicans Reject EPA Science Findings On Climate Change United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Written Description, Lisa Ouellette offers some “thoughts on the policy tradeoffs” at play in Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
Eversole appeals his sentence raising several technical challenges to the manner of calculating his offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
The decision joins the lone case from the Pennsylvania state court system on the issue, Palmiter v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
Central Hanover Bank &;amp; Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 (1950)); Concrete Pipe &;amp; Products of Cal., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda)   Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch)   France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Charlotte Garden analyzes Wednesday’s decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
 Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s &;lsquo;one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful… [read post]