Search for: "Doe v. State" Results 7221 - 7240 of 94,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
The Court of Appeal dismissed this submission and held that the status of ius cogens erga omnes “empowers but does not oblige” a state to intervene with another to insist on respect for the prohibition of torture. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:17 am by Lyle Denniston
The Trump team volunteered to submit its new Title VII brief in the Second Circuit Court case (Zarda v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:18 pm by Jeff Gittins
Last week, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Delta Canal Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 11:36 am by Pamela Wolf
The appeals court rejected their Constitutional Free Exercise Clause, Supremacy Clause, and Title VII arguments, finding that the emergency rule is religiously neutral, and that the state has the authority to grant exemptions based on the underlying circumstances and compelling public interest in preventing the spread of a communicable disease (Does 1-6 v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Therefore the central issue in both the cases under appeal was the interpretation and application of the statutory incompatibility ground of decision identified in the majority judgment in the Supreme Court in R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mayze Teitler
Ultimately, Judge Doughty’s opinion does nothing to answer these difficult questions. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:52 am
On the downside, classes at Boalt don't cover NY law for the most part, so you'll have to learn all the state specific stuff during BarBri. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Does that mean it had obligations before it had notice (bearing in mind that the “no general obligation to monitor” protection of Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive does not apply)? [read post]