Search for: "Does 1-100"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 14,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2015, 6:40 pm
On the other hand, patent owners had a 100 % success rates based on the 3 reported cases involving a motion brought by the owner. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:44 pm
Yes it does. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:29 am
Questions: 1. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:22 am
The problem is, Xarelto does too good a job of increasing blood flow in certain individuals. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:19 pm
Moreover, evidence that the defendant punched the complainant 20 times was legally insufficient to establish that he recklessly, rather than intentionally, caused her injuries (see People v Gonzalez, 1 NY3d 464 [2004]; People v Hafeez, 100 NY2d 253 [2003]), and therefore, under the circumstances presented, we do not reduce the assault in the first degree conviction to one of assault in the third degree (cf. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:02 am
If you have been injured in a Boston drunk driving accident, call for a free and confidential appointment at 1-888-367-2900. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:39 am
Does anyone think that such a Commission would not have a heavy dose -- maybe 100% -- of Obama appointees? [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:10 am
” 1) Make sure your harassment training is up to date. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Person B does nothing, but six months later files a criminal complaint. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Lopez-Valenzuela 14-825Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding, contrary to this Court's decision in Demore v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:19 pm
Also, the Director’s statement that with regard to the APR, only increases by more than 1/8 of a percent for fixed-rate loans or more than 1/4 of a percent for variable-rate loans require a new waiting period, does not reflect the regulatory environment and industry reaction. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:44 am
Generally, you are given a reasonable amount of time to bring your payments current because: 1. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:27 am
Though different courts might interpret the same standards differently, Congress “(1) delegated certification decisions to certifying agents—of which there are ‘[n]early 100’—whose interpretations of organic standards surely must diverge to some extent, and (2) expressly assigned U.S. district courts an interpretive role, albeit through the lens of arbitrary-and-capricious review. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:58 am
Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC, Case No. 1:13-cv-23656 (S.D. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:14 am
Importantly, even if such restrictions are imposed in return for immunity to intermediaries under Section 79(1), such perceived largesse to intermediaries does not legitimize the transgression of the boundaries set by Article 19(2). [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:40 pm
Let's do some fun NSA "two hop" math: if you have 100 contacts, and those folks have 100 contacts, that's 10,000 people. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
On these questions, the Court of Appeal held that (1) compliance with a noise ordinance does not foreclose a fair argument of significant noise impacts under CEQA, and (2) factual non-expert evidence can form the basis for a fair argument with respect to noise and traffic safety impacts. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:45 pm
Does it matter? [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:24 am
” Violations of G.S. 20-141(b) are infractions punishable by a fine of not more than $100. [read post]
7 May 2015, 1:39 pm
” In the following year, the Corporation made no estimated income tax payments, based on Internal Revenue Code Section 6655(d)(1)(B) which provides that required annual installments can be as low as “100% of the tax shown on the return of the Corporation for the preceding taxable year” (i.e., $0) The Code does go on to provide that this provision “shall not apply if…the corporation did not file a return for such preceding taxable year showing… [read post]
