Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 7221 - 7240 of 15,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 8:15 am by Richard Pildes
  Aggregating the figures for all four of these candidates, 22% of the money supporting Republican-candidate SuperPacs seems to have come from corporations. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:43 pm
  Justice Scalia - author of Blakely v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:08 am by Jamie Markham
The burden is on the defendant to bring forward information about his or her expenses and support obligations, State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:45 am by Chris Castle
 But only after you “discuss” the nonpayment and work for free for Pandora to figure out how to fix their systems. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:01 am
A well-defined and adequately enforced law that allows a "V" logo to be put only on truly vegan products would be a good start, and it would hardly be intrusive or burdensome. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:33 pm by Ilya Somin
Imagine an ordinary Californian reading the state Endangered Species Act to try to figure what actions might violate it. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Generally speaking, axial beam concentration is always a desideratum, and even if the board considered the terminology somehow limited to the configuration of Figure 9 of the application, this would not seem novel over, for instance, Figure 4 of document D2. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
It seems to me that the right question is “has this judge done a good (enough) job” — something voters might be able to figure out — rather than trying to figure out which candidate might be the best judge. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:45 pm by Gordon Firemark
– Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657 The case is Keeling v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Ruthanne Deutsch
No surprise that one of her favorite cases from her storied career fighting for gender equality was Weinberger v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:50 am
  An example taken at random is the official and presumably authentic note of a General Court decision from 11 February 2011, published online in the Official Journal on 24 March here: Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2011 — Yorma's v OHIM — Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb (YORMA’S) (Case T-213/09) ( 1 ) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark including the word element… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:59 pm by Michael O'Hear
Now, a federal district court has ruled on a habeas petition by a defendant convicted under the Florida statute, holding in Shelton v. [read post]