Search for: "House v. State" Results 7221 - 7240 of 25,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2015, 6:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Take Our Poll#2 Tribal Supreme Court v.#10 Tribal In-House Counsel Association TLPI nearly pulls off the largest upset of the tournament by defeating the Supreme Court Project but fades late, garnering only 44 percent of the vote. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
But LULAC is why the House of Representatives is much less representative of the American people than the Senate is, even though the malapportionment of the Senate is grossly unfair, giving the smallest states as many votes as the largest. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by NL
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
  Whereas the latter had stated that if Jinse entered into an insolvency procedure, that would trigger a right to rescind and therefore the refund guarantee (Article XII.3), the bonds did not. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 1:42 pm
The House bill only sought to curtail the effect of this provision (entered by Congress in 1984) by applying it to tangible items (as opposed to software inventions per the 2005 Federal Circuit appeal of Eolas Techs. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
Lewis “Scooter” Libby, former senior White House aide Karl C. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 7:19 am
Kevin Funnell at Bank Lawyers' Blog says Justice Scalia's majority opinion is not nearly as helpful to broad regulatory efforts by state AGs as one might have thought from some of the first reports. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
As the review states, the decision is that the offer is suitable now and at the time she returns to work. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
As the review states, the decision is that the offer is suitable now and at the time she returns to work. [read post]