Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 7,629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
On August 13, 2008, the New Jersey Appellate Division posted to its website in the "unpublished decisions" section a ruling in the case of Darren Kwiatkowski v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:38 am
Gun advocates, it would seem, are emboldened in the wake of D.C. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 4:11 pm
"State Rep. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
Finally, in an effort to strengthen states’ abilities to address fraudulent or inappropriate marketing of plans, effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, MIPPA requires plans to: use only agents and brokers licensed under state law; abide by state appointment laws; report any agent terminations to the state; and comply with state requests for information regarding the performance of agents, brokers, and… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 11:58 am
The parties stipulated that plaintiff responded to the "second round" of verification requests. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:05 am
See Stella v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 2:55 am
The Ohio Diesel Coalition is working in conjunction with the various State agencies to improve the grant process in the second round. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
This inaction is consistent with the United States’ decision in 2005 to withdraw the Untied States’ accession to jurisdiction of the [World Court] with regard to matters arising under the Convention. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:22 pm
Luis V. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:25 am
With the Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:41 pm
Supreme Court decision in Hall Street v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
This wasn't even a difficult case: the events took place in private behind closed and locked doors, not in the more contested world of the outdoors (cf Rowling (Murray v Big Picture)); the case wasn't contaminated as in Douglas by the existence of a threatened connected revenue stream. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:58 pm
PCMag.com did a round-up review of standalone backup systems - a really useful article. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:34 am
In D & D Land Holdings v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
What is clear is that Ms B spent a lot of time trawling round firms, both legal aid and non-legal aid. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 11:57 pm
Doesn't that describe every law student 'round about his/her third year? [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 3:09 pm
What if several influential Democrats stated that they would not confirm such a nominee? [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
” Citing a 1948 case — Briggs v. [read post]
