Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 7221 - 7240 of 28,992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2015, 6:37 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
For many years she had been living off $766 a month in Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits plus another $350 in EBT benefits (food stamps). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by William Baude
  But you cannot sue them simply because you live in the state and you have been hurt. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, the case shows how the Court approaches the balancing of Articles 8 and 10 when the private lives of those involved in politics is at stake. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
He then argues that principles of federalism would also have discouraged such a result, since they required the court to defer to the stated legislative purpose of the state that had passed the law. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 5:32 am
Non-citizens living in the United States are certainly not held in slavery, but Taney's infamous phrase is still eerily apt: Because of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the U.S. government can snatch any non-citizen living in the United States at any time, anywhere, and hold them indefinitely without the right of habeas corpus and without any of the criminal procedure protections afforded by the Bill of Rights. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
  Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM (Scotland) was heard on 9th April. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 andPinnock adopted. [read post]