Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 7221 - 7240 of 24,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by Evan Lee
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
Background The appellant – KBR, Inc – was a company incorporated in the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:31 am by Gregory Forman
 Subsequent to that December 1999 lecture, the United States and South Carolina Supreme Courts placed limitations on these grandparent visitation statutes. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Lee E. Berlik
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right to express one’s opinions without fear of defamation lawsuits or other punishment. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Lee E. Berlik
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right to express one’s opinions without fear of defamation lawsuits or other punishment. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Both observed that DOMA is constitutionally infirm to the extent that it reflects a bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group, an interest deemed impermissible in Romer v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 1:56 pm by Doug Weathers
According to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth in Adams v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 6:05 am
And in your five years on this fugitive [apprehension unit], how many times have you had occasion or individuals at -- hidden or come out from places when you were doing the sweep? [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm by David Lat
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:50 am
The primary jurisdiction invoked is in respect of the securities fraud pursuant to United States law, and a supplemental jurisdiction is alleged of the common law claims, again pursuant to United States law, on the grounds that the same facts and circumstances give rise to all claims. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:57 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court judgment in Kelo v City of New London sparked a political outcry which led to severe limitations being placed on the power of state authorities to compulsorily acquire property for private redevelopment. [read post]