Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 9,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Hough v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:23 am
The doctor-patient relationship did not create either agency or a contractual obligation. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:12 am
At issue in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
This enhancement of the state's prescription drug monitoring program will assist in patient care, and also help crack down on 'doc-shopping,' the practice of visiting several different doctors and pharmacies for prescription drugs. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
Consider the case of Lebron v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:38 pm
While recognizing that "there is little doubt that Rogers meant his statement to Friedlander about smoking marijuana to be confidential," the state's high court debated the definition of doctor in the law and whether a paramedic qualifies. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
In a recent landmark case, Pratten v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:11 am
Further, at any given time, there is a state of the art. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 7:08 pm
Leung v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
Matter of State of New York v Mark S., 2011 NY Slip Op 04792 (3d Dept. 2011) An astute commentator could probably write an article correlating the plaintiff’s bar’s purported financial detriment, viz. excluding defense doctors based upon impermissible “peer hearsay”, with the advent of Article 10 of the Mental Health Law. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 3:29 pm
In Wald, Jr. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:14 pm
For example, in Presson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
The Court of Appeal stated: “...absent evidence to support a finding of fact that, but for Dr. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 10:56 am
Roe then filed Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:22 am
See Weiss v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:53 am
In this case, the Second Circuit sides with a pro se litigant who was caught up in a battle of wills with a federal judge in Connecticut, who dismissed his racial discrimination case because plaintiff could not find a lawyer before time ran out.The case is Leftridge v Connecticut State Trooper, decided on May 12. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
” Noting that “our imagination is paralyzed” and that “the institutionalization of procedures that provide for granting and universalizing common interests can hardly occur within the organizational framework of a global state,” Habermas led the way, rethinking the role of civil society and the public political space and elaborating plans for a “cosmopolitan democracy” proper to nonstate forms of organization.Such governance precludes exclusion; it… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:24 pm
Pritchard v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:01 am
There are still significant opportunities to defend New Jersey DWI Refusal charges after the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in State v. [read post]
