Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 16,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
In Sequenom, v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
March 23, 2016), and Barcal v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Still, according to the PPIC, the data “are a strong indication that recent crime increases have occurred across the state. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Still, according to the PPIC, the data “are a strong indication that recent crime increases have occurred across the state. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Indeed, Article V of the the Constitution forbids depriving any s state “of its equal Suffrage in the Senate” even by constitutional amendment, except in the unlikely event that the state gives its consent. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
To say this is merely an unusual feature of an antidiscrimination law would not be strong enough. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:42 pm
Batson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
" And thus we have an introduction to today’s case, Tersigni v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:28 pm
It has a strong punitive element, besides being meant to serve as a major deterrent. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
The Friedrichs ruling leaves intact the precedent set in Abood v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:58 am
Trademark applicants in China have an additional “offensive” option not available in the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:35 am
York v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 7:21 am
However, in the recent Brown v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This precise issue was addressed by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:38 pm
One of the hackers is also charged with seeking to gain control of New York state infrastructure (U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
That’s a strong opinion. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm
Supreme Court review in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
While the Secretary of State’s decision could be judicially reviewable, it would not be appropriate for a national court to substitute its own assessment for the decision of the member states which constituted the committee. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
The Chief Justice calls Zubik v. [read post]
