Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 7241 - 7260 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 12:00 am by Ilya Somin
United States, the Court has held that these are two separate requirements that must both be met. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:40 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC affirmed ND Ca as to non-eligible matter under 35 USC 101: Plaintiff-appellant CyberSource Corporation (“Cyber- Source”) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:24 am
Google, Inc., citing the United States Supreme Court decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
 The Texas Court of Appeals answers in Martin v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Article elaborates upon that argument and situates it within the particular context of the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:29 am by Thomas G. Southard
The ITC concluded that Pioneer’s activities related only minimally to licensing the asserted patents in the United States and thus reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s initial determination that a domestic industry existed. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am by Rick Hills
Specifically, the federal spending power could legitimately impose special Medicare payroll taxes in states where the med mal liability really seems to impose an extra burden on the federal fisc. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Individuals tend to fare worse (.65 v. .74 for use, .27 v. .37 for ITU). [read post]