Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 13,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:05 pm
In 1998, the CAFC issued the State Street v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:29 pm
(Shout out to you, Bolling v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:46 pm
South Carolina Administrative Court Rule 405 authorizes a non-lawyer corporate officer, agent, or employee to represent the business in civil magistrate's court proceedings. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am
On January 12, 2018, the Supreme Court decided to take up one of these cases, Lucia v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:00 pm
Secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 12:02 pm
Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and on the Superior Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:41 am
“Its purpose is to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice” (Upjohn Co. v United States, 449 US at 389; see Spectrum Sys. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:11 pm
In a recent judgment on the issue (Frodl v Austria, Application no. 20201/04, 8 April 2010 – see our post) the European Court of Human Rights observed that “while this might not be obvious from its wording, Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 enshrines a characteristic principle of an effective democracy and is accordingly of prime importance in the Convention system”. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
“As early as 1872, the [United States Supreme] Court recognized that it was ‘a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that a judicial officer, in exercising the authority vested in him, [should] be free to act upon his own convictions, without apprehension of personal consequences to himself. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
However, said the court, only certain individuals who have “completed at least five years of continuous service” are entitled to such administrative due process by operation of law. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:51 am
For example, Congress has expressly provided that when the offices of OMB Director, FAA Administrator, or Administrator of the SBA are “vacant” or have a “vacancy,” the Deputy Director or Administrator acts as Director or Administrator. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
Bull v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
In Liang v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
In Liang v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:38 pm
Feb 23: In response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:00 am
In a recent case, Velez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:41 am
U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:00 am
In a recent case, Velez v. [read post]
