Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 17,852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
The company, Munched, Inc. halted its ICO after being contacted by the SEC, and agreed to an order in which the Commission found that its conduct constituted unregistered securities offers and sales. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:16 am
These include cases where there has been a failure to clean up and compensate for pollution on contaminated lands (such as Shell in Nigeria, or Texaco/Chevron in Ecuador), or cases in which there are allegations of corporate complicity with government security forces who engage in violent suppression of environmentally-concerned local community protestors or land protectors (see my blog on the Kiobel decision here, as well as Global Witness’ research documenting the alarming increase… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:21 am
Seuss secured an even better result on its trademark/unfair competition claims, which had previously been dismissed. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:56 am
She filed suit for sexual harassment, discrimination, and retaliation, among other claims, naming as defendants the three companies involved with the construction job as well as the harasser. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:26 pm
” Breach of Privacy Exclusion Another policy exclusion – the exclusion precluding coverage for breach of privacy — has recently become prominent for its possible impact on claims arising out of cyber security incidents. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:41 pm
According to the Sydney Morning Herald, linked on Price’s websites, an unlawful bribe from the Kazals to a government official secured the government’s agreement to pay for the renovation. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:30 pm
That’s because if you want to get out of jail and you cannot afford it, then you have to turn to one of these companies to secure your freedom. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
(see Privacy and Information Security Law Blog.) [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:47 pm
It may be due to defense-side instincts borne of a lifetime working on behalf of corporate defendants and their insurers, but I have to say that I find the defendant company’s position here to be sympathetic. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
The court granted in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
Resh, who are defending the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
[More…] REIT controllers owed fiduciary duties to public stockholders by Joanne Cursinella, J.D. in Jim Hamilton’s World of Securities Regulation Claims that certain defendants in a convoluted REIT scheme violated their fiduciary duties to stockholders survived a motion to dismiss. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court would have to appoint an outside party to argue the case since the Justice Department has turned its back on defending it, the brief says. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:01 pm
” In a brief December 4, 2017 news release (here), the Company said it will “vigorously defend the proceeding. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:13 pm
Organizations should alert and train employees on following company policies, spotting potential social engineering attacks, and having a clear method to escalate potential security risks. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm
The defendants were Eric Inselberg, an inventor, and his company, Inselberg Interactive, LLC. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Here’s an excerpt summarizing the legal background: Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) to protect corporate defendants from meritless securities class actions. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 5:17 pm
The reason the earlier cases were filed as derivative suits rather than as securities class action lawsuits was that in each case there had not been a significant drop in the defendant company’s share price when the company’s data breach was disclosed. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:23 pm
Mulvaney has suspended the CFPB’s investigation of a company that has challenged the CFPB’s constitutionality and authority to issue a civil investigative demand to the company pending a ruling by the federal district court hearing the company’s challenge. [read post]
